PENGARUH BEBAN KERJA DAN KELELAHAN PERAWAT TERHADAP PERAWATAN INFUS DI RUANG PERAWATAN KELAS IIIRSUD SUKOHARJO

Authors

  • Wiwit Ciptaningsih Haryanto Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Datoe Binangkang Bolaang Mongondow, Sulawesi Utara
  • Elsye Maria Rosa Manajemen Rumah Sakit, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.v3i2.185

Keywords:

Infusion care, Nurses’ workload, Fatigue

Abstract

Nurses have a big role in infusion installment and care according to the Standard Operating Procedure. Infection or other problems that may emerge during infusion installment can be minimized or avoided as long as the operating standard is met. Quantity work load, qualitative workload, physical workload, psychological workload, social workload and nurses’ fatigue are the major causes of infection due to working errors. This research aims at finding out the effect of nurses’ workload and fatigue on infusion care. This is a quantitative research using cross-sectional approach. The population consists of all nurses working in the third class of RSUD Sukoharjo. Using total sampling, the sampling consists of 28 nurses. Nurses’ workload that influenced infusion care comprises qualitative workload (p 0,000; B -1,847), nurse workload that did not influence infusion care comprised quantitative workload (p 0,109; B -0,243), physical workload (p 0,124; B -0,612), psychological workload (p 0,109; B -0,294), and social workload (p 0,875; B -0,053). There is no effect of nurse fatigue on infusion care (p 0,209; B -0,135). Quantitative workload did not influence nurse fatigue (p 0,196; B -0,367), qualitative workload did not influence nurse fatigue (p 0,053; B -1,331), physical workload did not influence nurse fatigue (p 0,171; B -1,061), and psychological workload did not influence nurse fatigue (p 0,980; B 0,021). The hardest nurse workload that had influenced infusion care in the third class of RSUD Sukoharjo is a qualitative workload. The more a qualitative workload that nurse felt, the worse infusion care they will treat. The workload has no effect on nurse fatigue.

References

LaRocca, J.C., 2002. Terapi Intravena. Edisi 4. EGC, Jakarta

Priharjo, R. (2005). Praktik Keperawatan Profesional : Konsep Dasar dan Hukum. Jakarta : EGC.

Potter & Perry, 2005. Buku Ajar Fundamental Keperawatan: Konsep, Proses, dan Praktik. EGC, Jakarta

Kozier, B., Erb, G., Blas, K. (2004). Fundamental of nursing, Proses Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Nurmianto, Eko (2003). Ergonomi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Guna widya.Jakarta.

Wijaya (2006). Hubungan Antara Shift Kerja dengan Gangguan Tidur dan Kelelahan Kerja Perawat Instalasi Rawat Darurat Rumah Sakit DR. Sardjito Yogyakarta. Sains Kesehatan 19(2) 235-245.

Kusmiyati. (2003). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Beban kerja Perawat dengan Stress kerja Perawat di Instalasi Rawat Intensif RSUD Dr. Moewardi Surakarta, Skripsi. Naskah sudah di publikasikan. UGM. Yogyakarta.

Marquis, B., and Houston, C. J. (2000). Leadership roles and Management Function in Nursing, Theory and Application (3rd). Philadelphia : Lippincoott Company.

Indah Restianti (2006). Beban Kerja dan Perasaan Kelelahan Kerja pada Pekerja Wanita dengan Peran Ganda Di PT.Asia Megah Foods Manufacture Padang. Sains Kesehatan 19(3) 347-361.

Gibson, J., 2000. Organisasi: Perilaku, Struktur, Proses. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Purwandari. H. (2000). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Stress Kerja Perawat di Instalasi Rawat Intensif RSU Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta.Skripsi. Naskah sudah di publikasikan. UGM. Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>