Hallo Effect in the Turnover Intention of Nurses at Hospital "X"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.91119Keywords:
Turnover Intention, Work-family Conflict, Rewards, Job SatisfactionAbstract
Turnover Intention is recognized as the best predictor of actual displacement. As a result of high turnover in nursing can lead to high financial costs, disrupt functional team formation, increase the workload of other nurses, and can reduce the quality of nursing services for patients and have an impact on overall hospital quality. This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the formation of intention to move to nurses who are influenced by job satisfaction, work-family conflict, and appreciation. The research design is quantitative with a type of explanatory causality research using primary data in the form of a questionnaire distributed to 174 people. The sampling technique in this study was carried out with the saturation sampling method. This research uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis. The unit of analysis includes individual nurses with cross sectional time horizons. The results obtained are work-family conflict, appreciation, job satisfaction simultaneously affect the intention to move nurses at the "X" hospital. Work-family conflict has a negative effect on job satisfaction. Giving awards has a positive effect on job satisfaction. Job satisfaction gives effect to the formation of the intention to move. Work-family conflict has a positive effect on the formation of the intention to move. The awarding has a negative effect on the formation of nurses' intentions. The research findings show the “hallo effect” causes the actualization obtained by nurses has not been able to increase job satisfaction, resulting in stronger intention to move.
References
Nasurdin AM, Ling TC, Khan SN. The relation between turnover intention, high performance work practices (HPWPs), and organisational commitment: A study among private hospital nurses in Malaysia. Asian Acad Manag J. 2018;23(1):23–51.
Bogonko N, Cathure C. An investigation into factors causing high nurse turnover in mission hospitals in Kenya : A case for Pcea Chogoria Hospital. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2015;5(3):55–86.
Gillies DA. Nursing management: A systems approach. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1994.
President of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 2014 Tentang Keperawatan. 38 Indonesia; 2014 p. 1–52.
Ministry of Health RI. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI: Situasi tenaga keperawatan. Jakarta; 2017.
Bianchi SM, Casper LM, King RB. Work, family, health, and well-being. Bianchi SM, Casper LM, King RB, editors. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. 579 p.
March JG, Simon HA. Organizations. New York: Wiley; 1958.
Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM. Employee - organization linkages : The psychology of commitment, absenteenism, and turnover. P. Warr, editor. New York: Academic Press; 1982.
Menezes IG, Menezes AC, Ruggeri K, Moraes ER, Lozado JA, Sandbrand, D. Muszynski P. Development and validation of the multidimensional turnover intentions scale. In: BAM2018 Conference Proceedings: Driving productivity in uncertain and challenging times. London: British Academy of Management; 2018. p. 324.
Locke EA, editor. The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behaviour. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003. 465 p.
Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn RP, Snoek JD, Rosenthal RA. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley; 1964.
Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manag Rev. 1985;10(1):76–88.
Iskra-Golec I, Barnes-Farrell J, Bohle P, editors. Social and family issues in shift work and non standard working hours. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. 202 p.
Netemeyer RG, Boles JS, McMurrian R. Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(4):400–10.
Goode WJ. A theory of role strain. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(4):483–96.
Poelmans SAY, Caligiuri PM. Harmonizing work, family, and personal life. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Carlson DS, Frone MR. Relation of behavioral and psychological involvement to a new four-factor conceptualization of work-family interference. ournal Bus Psychol. 2003;17(4):515–35.
Voydanoff P. Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. J Marriage Fam. 1988;50(3):749–61.
Allen TD, Andreassi JK, Antani AK, Ashbourne LM, Aycan Z, Ayman R, et al. Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practice. Korabik K, Lero DS, Whitehead DL, editors. Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2008. 430 p.
Carlson DS, Kacmar KM, Williams LJ. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. J Vocat Behav. 2000;56(2):249–76.
Poelmans S, Greenhaus JH, Maestro MLH, editors. Expanding the boundaries of work-family research: A vision for the future. 1st ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. 366 p.
Sinding K, Waldstrøm C. Organisational behaviour. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. 648 p.
Wells J. Just rewards. 1st ed. sydney: Allen & Unwin; 2004.
Ruddy AC. The world at work handbook of compensation, benefits & total rewards: A comprehensive guide for HR professionals. 1st ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. 845 p.
Gruneberg MM. Understanding job satisfaction. 1st ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1979. 170 p.
Gagné M, editor. The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. 446 p.
Gibson J, Ivancevich J, Konopaske R. Organizations: Behaviour, structure, processes. 14th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
Luthans F. Organizational behavior : An evidence-based approach. 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
